Check a Special Leave Petition against the Registry's requirements before it is filed.
An AOR uploads the completed filing set as a single PDF. The platform checks it against a procedural rule base drawn from the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, the Registry's Handbook and its circulars, and returns a report of potential defects, each with its source reference.
From signup to the first report.
Sign up with an AOR code or a bar enrolment code.
Access is enabled by Nyave within three hours of signup.
Notice is sent by email.
Upload the complete Special Leave Petition set as a single PDF.
It is checked against the Supreme Court Registry's filing requirements. Each finding cites its rule and page.
One real filing, analysed by the production engine.
- Petitioner
- Yogesh Chand Aggarwal
- Respondent
- Central Bureau of Investigation
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Allegation
- Alleged receipt of gratification of ₹10,000 · Section 7, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Pages
- 279
- Custody at filing
- 724 days
- SC Registry defects
- 15
Defect breakdown
Registry comparison
Listing Proforma not included or not completely filled and signed
Checklist item 21(i) · SC Practice and Procedure Handbook 2017 Chapter XIII
Filing will be returned by the SC Registry.
Annexure description incorrect in Index of paper-books
Checklist item 2 · Order XXI Rule 3(1)(d)(i)
Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.
Custody certificate not filed, not proper, or translation not provided
Checklist item 18 · Order XXII Rule 5
Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.
Advocate checklist not filed or incomplete: AOR checklist (Annexure Y) absent or in superseded format
Checklist item N/A · Order IV Rule 7
Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.
Vakalatnama not duly executed: unsigned, undated, not certified or identified by AOR, not filed for all petitioners, or Memo of Appearance not filed
Checklist item 7(i) · Order IV Rule 7, SC Rules 2013
Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Verification against the Supreme Court Registry's requirements is recommended before filing.
Watch the verification, start to finish.
Each finding: level, rule, page.
The report grades each finding as critical, serious, verification or advisory, shows a confidence indicator on every flag, and writes each finding twice: a terse line for the AOR and a step-by-step line for the clerk.
A finding that does not apply: mark it incorrect. Registry officers exercise discretion. Verify before filing.
Check a Special Leave Petition that was defected. See what Nyave finds.
Five checks for every user in the beta; no charge; the beta runs to 31 December 2026.
What Happens to a Filing
Your documents are not used to train any AI model.
Reading uses Indian OCR, including Sarvam's service under Sarvam's terms.
Explanations are written from the finding only, never from your document.
Uploaded PDFs are deleted 24 hours after processing, and reports after 14 days.
The report identifies what the Registry is likely to flag; what to do about it remains the lawyer's decision.
Nyave does not draft the petition. It does not advise on the merits or on strategy. It does not replace the Advocate-on-Record's professional judgment or the Registry's scrutiny.
No templates, no case-law search, no other courts, no other filing types.
How It Works: Technology
