Beta Now open by invitation Request access
02 Where we stand

Built in the open. Proven on real filings.

A staged view of the build: where we are today, what we are hardening, and the road to launch.

Engine Output

One real filing, analysed by the production engine.

Engine output · Real Supreme Court filing · Tested 2 September 2026, 23:16 IST
Petitioner
Yogesh Chand Aggarwal
Respondent
Central Bureau of Investigation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Allegation
Alleged receipt of gratification of ₹10,000 · Section 7, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Pages
279
Custody at filing
724 days
SC Registry defects
15
Processing time264.38 seconds
Pages analyzed279
Nyave Knowledge BaseSC Rules 2013 · Handbook 2025 · SC Registry Circulars

Defect breakdown

Total defects54
Critical (RETURN)1
Serious (FLAG)11 · incl. 2 high
For verification33
Advisory (NOTE)9

Registry comparison

SC Registry defect notice15 defects
Top 5 caught by engine5 of 5
Top 5 findings
Return

Listing Proforma not included or not completely filled and signed

Checklist item 21(i) · SC Practice and Procedure Handbook 2017 Chapter XIII

Filing will be returned by the SC Registry.

Flag · High

Annexure description incorrect in Index of paper-books

Checklist item 2 · Order XXI Rule 3(1)(d)(i)

Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.

Flag · High

Custody certificate not filed, not proper, or translation not provided

Checklist item 18 · Order XXII Rule 5

Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.

Flag

Advocate checklist not filed or incomplete: AOR checklist (Annexure Y) absent or in superseded format

Checklist item N/A · Order IV Rule 7

Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.

Flag

Vakalatnama not duly executed: unsigned, undated, not certified or identified by AOR, not filed for all petitioners, or Memo of Appearance not filed

Checklist item 7(i) · Order IV Rule 7, SC Rules 2013

Defect likely to be raised on scrutiny.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Verification against the Supreme Court Registry's requirements is recommended before filing.

Watch the verification, start to finish.

Build Progress · Detailed View

Detection Engine → Beta Preparation → Beta Access.

Stage 01 Detection Engine Complete

The detection engine is operational end-to-end: a 106-rule knowledge layer built on SC Rules 2013, the SC Handbook 2025, and 13 Registry circulars, deployed on AWS Mumbai production infrastructure.

Stage 02 Beta Preparation Complete

Frontend development with our engineering team, backend-frontend integration, and production hardening for concurrent users.

Stage 03 Beta Access Live 15 September 2026

Early access with Advocates-on-Record, running real filings pre-submission.

The Dataset Behind It

Built on a proprietary dataset of real Supreme Court filings.

Our verification engine is built on a proprietary dataset of over 2,000* SLPs filed in the last 8 years, capturing more than 10,000* unique defect instances. The knowledge base is locked, and the detection engine is validating against real Supreme Court filings, both digital and scanned, across civil, criminal, and custody matters.

2,000*SLPs

Special Leave Petitions in the proprietary dataset.

8years

Span of filings the dataset draws from.

10,000*instances

Unique defect instances captured across the dataset.

Future Roadmap

From AoR tooling to access at scale.

Phase 1 · For the Lawyers

Advocates-on-Record & lawyers

A subscription model with two tiers for Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) and regular lawyers, with plans to expand horizontally across major High Courts.

Phase 2 · For the Citizens

Undertrials & families

Expanding to a high-volume platform serving 4,00,000+ undertrial prisoners and their families, providing free document understanding and clear case summaries.

* Based on our own dataset; actual figures may differ.